Best clinics for breast augmentation in Gangnam
Tier-vetted Gangnam clinics for breast augmentation, implant, fat transfer, and combination approaches.
Breast augmentation in Korea is technically excellent but stylistically different from Western preferences, Korean clinics favor smaller increases (250–325cc range), dual-plane subglandular placement, and natural-feeling silicone. Bring reference photos.
Implant vs fat transfer (quick)
- Implants = predictable size, lasts 10–15 years, requires anesthesia + chest cavity work.
- Fat transfer = up to ~1 cup increase, no implants, requires donor fat (lipo from thighs/abdomen). Less predictable; some fat reabsorbs.
- Combination = implant base + fat transfer for cleavage refinement. Best results, highest cost.
See our full comparison.
The shortlist
Girin PS
gold · Seocho9.1/10 on GangnamUnni · 2,359 verified reviews · searched-for by name.
Full clinic profile →Pitangui Clinic
gold · Gangnam8.8/10 on GangnamUnni · 1,741 verified reviews · searched-for by name.
Full clinic profile →Realistic budget
Implant augmentation: $5,500–$10,000 depending on implant brand (Motiva > Mentor > Korean brands). Fat transfer: $6,500–$11,000. Combination: add 30–40% over the implant price.
Recovery
Plan 10 to 14 days in Seoul. First 5 days: limited arm movement, pain medication. Day 7: drain removal (if used). Day 10 to 14: post-op follow-up and ok to fly. No flying with general anesthesia surgery for 7+ days due to DVT risk.
What separates the best breast augmentation clinics
This is general anesthesia bone-and-tissue surgery. The shortlist filters for the practices where the surgical infrastructure matches the marketing.
- An anesthesiologist, not a rotating contractor. The top clinics have a board-certified anesthesiologist on staff for the entire case. Confirm in writing; get the name.
- Implant fluency across brands. A good surgeon carries Motiva, Mentor, and one Korean line, and explains the tradeoff for your specific tissue. A clinic that always uses one brand is a clinic optimizing for margin, not fit.
- Sizers in the room. The best Gangnam practices put external sizers in your bra at the consult and have you walk, sit, and photograph yourself before committing to a volume. If the consult is verbal-only, the size decision is the surgeon's, not yours.
- 3D imaging. Vectra or Crisalix simulation is now standard at premium clinics, not a luxury. It is the closest thing to a guarantee about scale and projection.
- A capsular contracture protocol. The clinic tells you, in writing, what happens at year five or year ten if a capsule forms. Practices without a protocol are practices that disappear when something goes wrong.
Real prices, all-in
| Approach | Budget | Typical | Premium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implant, Korean brand | $4,500 – $5,800 | $5,800 – $7,500 | $7,500 – $9,000 |
| Implant, Mentor / Allergan | $5,500 – $7,000 | $7,000 – $8,800 | $8,800 – $10,500 |
| Implant, Motiva | $6,500 – $8,200 | $8,200 – $10,500 | $10,500 – $13,000 |
| Fat transfer, single session | $5,500 – $7,000 | $7,000 – $9,000 | $9,000 – $11,500 |
| Hybrid (implant + fat refinement) | $8,500 – $10,500 | $10,500 – $13,500 | $13,500 – $17,000 |
| Revision (capsular, malposition) | $5,500 – $8,000 | $8,000 – $12,000 | $12,000 – $18,000 |
The "all-in" column assumes anesthesiologist fee, two nights nursing, drains, post-op bra, and follow-up. Foreign-card surcharge of 3 to 4% is on top.
Common variants worth understanding
- Smooth vs textured shell. The market has largely shifted to smooth after textured implants were associated with a rare lymphoma. Most reputable Gangnam clinics no longer offer textured for primary cases.
- Round vs teardrop. Round implants give upper-pole fullness, teardrop gives a more natural slope. Teardrop requires precise pocket dissection; not every surgeon does enough of them to be fluent.
- Subglandular vs sub-pectoral vs dual-plane. Sub-pectoral and dual-plane have lower visible-edge rates and are the standard for thin patients. Subglandular is faster recovery, more "obvious" result.
- Inframammary vs trans-axillary vs peri-areolar incision. Inframammary is the surgeon's friend (best visualization); trans-axillary hides the scar but limits pocket control. The right answer depends on your starting anatomy, not your scar preference.
- Fat transfer to breast. Maximum increase per session is roughly one cup; 30 to 50% of transferred fat is reabsorbed. Real result requires staged sessions or a fat-rich starting body.
What a good outcome looks like at 1 / 6 / 12 / 24 months
- Month 1. Implants sit high and tight; upper pole is visibly full. This is normal, not the final result.
- Month 3. "Drop and fluff" begins; implants settle into the lower pocket and the upper pole softens.
- Month 6. Final shape. Scars are pink, will fade further over the next year.
- Month 12. Scars white and flat. Sensation has mostly returned; nipple sensation may take longer.
- Month 24. Capsule has stabilized. If a capsular contracture is going to develop, this is when. Most don't.
"Pick the surgeon and the size on different days. Both choices need to age well."
Questions to ask at the consult
- For my tissue and frame, which implant brand and profile do you recommend, and why not the others?
- Round, anatomic, or hybrid? Smooth shell only? What is your textured-implant policy?
- Subglandular, sub-pectoral, or dual-plane, and what drives that decision for me?
- What incision approach, and what is the typical scar at twelve months in your patients?
- Will you let me try external sizers in the room before I commit?
- Do you use 3D simulation? Can I see the simulated result?
- Who is the anesthesiologist for my case, and can I have their credentials?
- Is overnight nursing standard? What is the night-nurse-to-patient ratio?
- What is your capsular contracture rate in your last 500 cases, and what is the protocol if I develop one?
- What is your revision policy in year one, and what is my exposure if revision is needed in years two through ten?
Red flags during the consult
- One brand, one approach, one incision, for every patient. There is no such patient.
- Aggressive size-up pressure ("you should go bigger") without sizers in the room.
- Vague on implant warranty and capsular protocol.
- No 3D imaging, no external sizing, verbal-only volume decision.
- The named surgeon is also the "marketing director" of the clinic.
- Heavy discount for booking on consult day.